Budget Accountability Priorities for New Port Richey

Core Standard

Residents should not need a finance background to understand how city money is being used.

If the city can justify a transfer, allocation, or capital priority, it should be able to explain it clearly before approval. That means showing the method, the authority, the purpose, and the public impact in a way people can actually follow.

This document outlines the standards I would use to push for that level of accountability.

A. Methodology
For every major transfer or allocation, the city should disclose:

  • the formula used

  • the assumptions behind that formula

  • the departments or services included

  • whether the amount reflects actual current activity or a carried-forward budget figure

B. Authority
For every major transfer or recurring allocation, the city should identify:

  • who approved it

  • under what policy, ordinance, budget authority, or agreement it was approved

  • whether council reviewed the amount itself or only the total budget package

  • whether the receiving body, including the CRA where relevant, had meaningful oversight over the amount charged

C. Plain-Language Public Explanation
Residents should be able to see, in one place:

  • who is paying

  • who is receiving

  • what public purpose is being served

  • whether the amount is tied to operations, debt, overhead, or capital

  • how long the transfer is expected to continue

D. Capital Oversight
Council and the public should receive regular, readable updates on:

  • which capital projects were approved

  • which have started

  • which are delayed

  • which changed in scope or cost

  • which dropped off the list and why

E. CRA Accountability
The CRA should be treated as a serious strategic tool, not a black box.

That includes clear answers to the following questions:

  • What are the amortization schedules for CRA-related obligations?

  • What transfers from the CRA to the city are administrative versus operational?

  • What services are actually being delivered in exchange?

  • How much of CRA revenue is going to public-purpose infrastructure versus private-development inducement?

  • What is the long-term plan for the CRA’s role in city finances?

F. Operating Growth Versus Actual Need
The city should be able to show:

  • where spending growth is outpacing measurable demand

  • whether staffing or equipment growth matches actual service need

  • whether technology and process improvements are being used to improve efficiency before adding ongoing cost

G. My Governing Standard

If elected, I would push for a simple rule:

If the city can justify a transfer, it should be able to explain it clearly before approval.

That means no more asking residents to reverse-engineer the budget after the fact. It means showing the math up front.